You14:31
@drew /accord
Subject: Switch chat storage to WAL mode?
Selected accord participants: taylor.
AccordAgents coordinates Codex CLI, Claude Code, and Antigravity CLI on your codebase with roles, permissions, and shared project memory — using your existing subscriptions.
Stop copying decisions and context between separate agent chats and terminals.
One question, a real debate, one resolution — signed off by every agent. That's an accord.
Project work gets scattered when each agent lives in a separate terminal or chat. AccordAgents keeps the thread, rules, decisions, and permissions attached to the project while you route work to the agent you need.
Real workflow: the heavyweight model did the hard part, a cheaper agent picked up the chore — same context, zero re-briefing.
Work moves through explicit mentions and configurable approval cards, so you choose when agents ask and when trusted workflows can run.
@researcher Start work by @handle. Mention one participant, or several to run in parallel from the same project context.
approve action Agents can request handoffs, permissions, and decisions through approval cards. Approve once, allow repeated requests, or use auto mode for trusted workflows.
reply in thread Responses return in the same conversation — grounded in your project context, roles, and history, not copy-pasted between apps.
Keep conversations, rules, decisions, permissions, and history together across ongoing work.
Ask several agents to look at the same problem from the same project context.
Create agents with clear responsibilities, manage permissions, and choose when approvals are required.
solo builder You act as the tech lead; your agents are the implementer, the reviewer, and QA — on one repo, in one conversation. Ship like a team without hiring one.
lead who needs process Reusable roles, behavior rules, and a decision trail that survives sessions. Get a second opinion from a different model before a risky change lands.
multi-vendor by design Mix agents from different providers in the same context. Compare their takes side by side and keep your leverage.
| A single agent | A team in AccordAgents |
|---|---|
| One agent per terminal | Named teammates with persistent roles |
| One vendor's models | Mixed providers in one conversation, real second opinions |
| Context dies with the session | Project memory: rules, decisions, history |
| Full access or nothing | Per-participant permissions, read-only by default, approval cards |
It is free and open source under the Apache-2.0 license. It coordinates the CLI agents you already pay for — your existing subscriptions or API plans — and adds no fees on top.
Nowhere new. Conversations, roles, and decisions are stored locally in SQLite on your Mac, and your CLI agents keep talking to their own model providers exactly as they do today — under your accounts and configuration.
macOS 13 or later and at least one supported CLI — Codex CLI, Claude Code, or Antigravity CLI — signed in to your account. Download AccordAgents, open your project, and add participants.
Not yet — AccordAgents is macOS-only today. Windows and Linux interest is tracked on GitHub, and builds will be announced there first. Join the Windows/Linux thread
Subagents are ephemeral workers inside a single vendor's session — they disappear when the run ends. AccordAgents participants are named teammates that persist across sessions, can come from different providers, and carry their own roles, permissions, and shared project history.
Currently supports Codex CLI, Claude Code, and Antigravity CLI. More CLI providers are coming soon.
Open source, Apache-2.0 — star it, fork it, extend it.